Haunting,
fragile, uncomfortable, defiant. Schiele’s nudes each have their own character
and mood. He does like a good vagina or two, so it’s not for the faint hearted.
Kate and I went to have a look at the weekend at the Radical Nude collection at
The Courtauld Gallery. (No cameras allowed unfortunately so you’ll
have to make do with pictures from the internet).
His subjects
namely being sex and the body, his work is extremely varied. Some seem feeble
and gentle with pale and washed out colours, the tentative almost apologetic
lines, even the submissive poses of his subjects. Crouched, hunched, hidden
beneath cloth, they seem to be receding from the page. Others are seductive,
pornographic, aggressive even. Pushed out chests, spread legs, prominent genitals
all make them difficult to take in – it seems Schiele was a randy young man a
bit obsessed with lady bits (there are a lot of muffs), but he was also rule
changing in how the human form is presented. Schiele’s work pushes us to feel
rather than just observe.
This first
image is of his sister. She’s strong, lean, thoughtful and composed. She’s comfortable
in her skin and not at all sexual in my mind, despite having lost her top.
In contrast,
he paints the second woman as vulnerable and girlish, with no hair on her
vagina she seems young, but sexual with her long post coital hair flowing down
her back.
The third is
provocative. Her tilted head is suggestive and her red hair and fiery nipples make
her confident and forward. I can feel his lust for her, despite her being quite
ugly. Her vacant expression suggests she’s done it all before and to Schiele
perhaps just a body from which to get his kicks.
This piece is
perhaps the most intense for me in terms of emotion. Her aggressive and defensive
body language keeps us out and contempt oozes out of every pore. Whether she
actually looked like this, or if Schiele was painting his perception of her is
another matter. I can’t imagine why she’d sit for him if she hated it that much…
The last is
like a little doll. She’s a sad, a child-like figure with a weak, watery
disposition (oddly except for her lips and nipples). Maybe she was dying of the
influenza that killed him, or maybe he just saw her that way. In any case, she’s
no curvaceous goddess reclining on a chaise longue.
We only
stayed for half an hour or so, the bulbous labia and sexually charged poses
were too much for us. Pop along yourself to the The Courtauld gallery
next to Somerset House. The exhibition is showing until the 18th of
January next year.
0 comments:
Post a Comment